[patch/rfc] KFAIL EBUSY kernel bug

Andrew Cagney ac131313@redhat.com
Thu Jan 8 20:33:00 GMT 2004


> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:12:23PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Ref: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1502
>> Turns out that the EBUSY error status value I was seeing is a Linux 
>> Kernel bug.  This KFAIL's that case.
>> 
>> baring problems, I'll commit in a few days
> 
> 
> If it's a Linux kernel bug, that makes it an XFAIL, not a KFAIL.

Oops, yes (I had my Red Hat kernel, rather than FSF GDB glasses on).

>> 2004-01-08  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>
>> 
>> 	* gdb.base/fileio.exp: For "Renaming a directory to a non-empty
>> 	directory returns ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST", treat EBUSY as a KFAIL.
> 
> 
> -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer 




More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list