[patch/rfc] KFAIL EBUSY kernel bug
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@redhat.com
Thu Jan 8 20:33:00 GMT 2004
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:12:23PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Ref: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1502
>> Turns out that the EBUSY error status value I was seeing is a Linux
>> Kernel bug. This KFAIL's that case.
>>
>> baring problems, I'll commit in a few days
>
>
> If it's a Linux kernel bug, that makes it an XFAIL, not a KFAIL.
Oops, yes (I had my Red Hat kernel, rather than FSF GDB glasses on).
>> 2004-01-08 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
>>
>> * gdb.base/fileio.exp: For "Renaming a directory to a non-empty
>> directory returns ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST", treat EBUSY as a KFAIL.
>
>
> -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list