[ob] Remove initializations of memset'd structure

[Elena Zannoni]

Eli Zaretskii writes:
 > > From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
 > > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:30:06 -0500
 > >  > >  
 > >  > > -    MSYMBOL_TYPE (m) = mst_unknown;
 > >  > 
 > >  > This part of the patch seems to assume that mst_unknown has the value
 > >  > zero.  Should we have such assumptions in the code?
 > > 
 > > Yes, in symtab.h mst_unknown is 0.
 > 
 > I know that, I looked it up in symtab.h.  The question is, should the
 > code rely on the fact that zeroing out the struct causes the
 > MSYMBOL_TYPE member to become mst_unknown.  Suppose we change the
 > enumeration some day, that would break the code.
 > 

Oh, I see. I misunderstood you. 

 > So I think a comment is not enough, we should leave that line alone.
 > In general, it is my opinion that code should not assume anything
 > about the numerical values of enumerated types.

That's true. It would be safer to leave the line alone. I'll change
it back. Also language_unknown is used similarly.

I've committed this.

2004-02-17  Elena Zannoni  <ezannoni@redhat.com>

	* objfiles.c (terminate_minimal_symbol_table): Add back
	initialization of MSYMBOL_TYPE.


Index: objfiles.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/objfiles.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -p -r1.50 objfiles.c
--- objfiles.c  16 Feb 2004 21:14:24 -0000      1.50
+++ objfiles.c  17 Feb 2004 19:36:28 -0000
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ terminate_minimal_symbol_table (struct o
       = &objfile->msymbols[objfile->minimal_symbol_count];
  
     memset (m, 0, sizeof (*m));
+    /* Don't rely on these enumeration values being 0's.  */
+    MSYMBOL_TYPE (m) = mst_unknown;
     SYMBOL_INIT_LANGUAGE_SPECIFIC (m, language_unknown);
   }
 }