[RFA]: Patch for ia64-tdep.c to cross-compile

Jeff Johnston jjohnstn@redhat.com
Tue Feb 10 19:37:00 GMT 2004


Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:30:15 -0500
>>From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
>>
>>>If this is an obvious patch, shouldn't we have some coding rule
>>>somewhere to cover it?  It certainly isn't obvious out of the GDB
>>>context, i.e. not a standard coding practice.
>>
>>Eli,
>>
>>   Do you want me to hold off on checking this in or do you just wish to discuss 
>>whether such a patch should be marked as obvious in the future?
> 
> 
> I don't think you need to hold off; sorry that I wasn't more clear.
> 

Thanks.  I just wanted to be sure before checking it in.  The patch has been 
checked in.

> What I wanted to discuss is whether we need to put some text somewhere
> that includes the use of paddr* functions in the GDB coding standards.
> Then it would be clear that fixing any deviation from that falls under
> the obvious fix rule.
> 



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list