[patch] remove deprecated core support from QNX NTO
Thu Dec 23 16:28:00 GMT 2004
Kris Warkentin <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Any reason why you can't use the generic register support in
> > i386-tdep.c?
> Actually, I take advantage of the i387 generics for the floating point
> regs since our kernel just uses the opcode to push them in the normal
> order. Unfortunately though, our gpregs are in a different order and
> not all of them are there so we have some unique mappings.
QNX NTO is in no way special about this. I was thinking about something like the attached patch. Could you test that one? This approach simply reduces the amount of code needed.
The patch also contains a unrelated change to the shared library code. It also removes a unneeded function. But it'd be nice if you could test that I didn't mess things up.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5663 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gdb-patches