[rfc] sigstep additions
Andrew Cagney
cagney@gnu.org
Tue Aug 24 14:29:00 GMT 2004
> ac> I'd like to turn this into an RFA.
>
> mec> I'll approve it in 24-48 hours, unless Daniel or Mark has an objection
> mec> or wants more time for review. (Not even sure if Mark has an interest
> mec> in signal handling).
>
> Oops, that was 8 days ago! I dropped my to-do item.
> I'm sorry about that.
Here's a revision, I missed one case - single stepping off a breakpoint
when there's a signal.
Now the interesting bit.
i386: single-stepping over a signal handler fails
ppc: single-stepping over a breakpoint (with signal handler) fails
I suspect they are the same underlying bug.
Tested on i386 (FC2 with a `fixed' kernel) and PPC (with a `fixed' kernel).
Still ok?
Andrew
`fixed' refers to a kernel that can correctly single-step a system call.
> This patch is approved.
>
> ===
>
> 2004-08-10 Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> * gdb.base/sigstep.exp (breakpoint_to_handler)
> (skip_over_handler, skip_to_handler): New test procedures.
> (advance, advancei): Add a proper prefix, do not use
> rerun_to_main.
> * gdb.base/sigstep.c (main): Change to use an infinite loop.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diffs
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20040824/6806756a/attachment.ksh>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list