Question about blockframe.c:inside_main_func()

[Andrew Cagney]

> 
> On Apr 29, 2004, at 8:09 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> However, I think the entire function's contents are bogus.  It should look like:
>>
>>     if (symtab_find_function_range_by_name (main_name (), &low_pc, &high_pc))
>>       return pc in [low_pc, high_pc);
>>     else
>>       return 0;
>>
>> so that the logic is pushed back into the symbol table (an obvious thing for lookup_function_range_by_name to do is implement a look-aside cache).
> 
> 
> Just so I'm clear -- this is a function that doesn't exist right now, right?

Yes.

> We have at least one similar address range cache in the Apple gdb to keep track of some oft-referenced ObjC dispatch functions (which could be subsumed by a symtab_find_function_range_by_name() type function).

I think there are also signal trampoline lookups that do something similar.

>> (they need to be killed off anyway as PIE breaks the assumption that the values are constant across function invocations).
> 
> 
> I don't really know what PIE means - I thought it meant that the executable was built PIC and would be loaded at an arbitrary address on each run.  How could a function shift locations while the inferior is executing?

Tipo, it should say ``program invocations'' like you describe.

>>> [*] We have something called "ZeroLink" where the main executable -- the symfile_objfile -- is a tiny stub that demand-loads each object file (formatted like a shared library) as functions/global variables in those .o's are referenced.  So in our case, the symfile_objfile doesn't contain main at all; hence me looking into this function and scratching my head about why it's re-searching for this function every time...
>>
>>
>> you might want to look at PIE.
> 
> 
> It's a pretty different thing, if I'm not mistaken.  PIE is about loading your executable at an arbitrary address, isn't it?  ZeroLink is about avoiding the static link editor stage in development.  You build your .o's (and they're built as little shared libraries), and you run the ZL stub program in place of your main application.  The ZL stub program loads at the usual 0x0 address, like a normal program.  It builds up a list of available functions in all the .o's and pulls them in on-demand.  It's entirely a development-time speed deal.  I thought PIE was more about security, putting the executable in different places so hax0rs can't hardcode where interesting functions et al are located.
> 
> Maybe I misunderstood what PIE encompasses?

In both cases:
- the relevant symbol cache has to be flushed each time the program is 
re-started
- the lookup is based on a name
so while some aspects are different, others are not.

Andrew