Multiplexed registers and invalidating the register cache

[Orjan Friberg]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:43:12 -0400
>>From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>>
>>>>>>>+The target's register contents has changed.
>>>>
>>>>>FYI, this should probably read:
>>>>>	The target's memory or register contents have [has?] changed.
>>>>>eli?
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm not sure; what is the difference between the two wordings?
>>
>>"have" sounds right (...), hmm.  Check dictionary ``/has/ 3rd person 
>>_singular_, present of /have/'' [canadian oxford] so "have" is correct.
> 
> 
> I didn't realize that you were talking only about "has" vs "have"
> (your alternative wording was different in other ways).  I agree that
> "have" is correct here.

Ok to commit the below, then?  (Or should the event description include 
the "memory" part of Andrew's suggestion as well?)

Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.406
diff -u -p -r1.406 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog   26 Apr 2004 09:36:56 -0000      1.406
+++ ChangeLog   29 Apr 2004 08:03:19 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2004-04-29  Orjan Friberg  <orjanf@axis.com>
+
+       * observer.texi (GDB Observers): Correct spelling.
+
  2004-04-26  Orjan Friberg  <orjanf@axis.com>

         * observer.texi (GDB Observers): Add target_changed event.
Index: observer.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/observer.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 observer.texi
--- observer.texi       26 Apr 2004 09:36:56 -0000      1.4
+++ observer.texi       29 Apr 2004 08:03:19 -0000
@@ -75,5 +75,5 @@ The inferior has stopped for real.
  @end deftypefun

  @deftypefun void target_changed (struct target_ops *@var{target})
-The target's register contents has changed.
+The target's register contents have changed.
  @end deftypefun


-- 
Orjan Friberg
Axis Communications