RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
Andrew Cagney
cagney@gnu.org
Sun Oct 19 15:55:00 GMT 2003
> This will make it simpler to have, for instance, a breakpoint on both the
> in-charge and not-in-charge constructors without bothering the user with
> that detail. Similarly (eventually!) for copies of an inlined function, or
> multiple copies of an executed line. This is a bit of a ways in the future
> but I'm working on it.
I get the feeling that the naming discussion has converged to:
"breakpoint" and "location"
where a breakpoint has 1:N locations, and multiple breakpoints can share
common locations.
Unlike the "user" vs "machine" I don't see us having much difficulty
explaining "breakpoint" and "location" to either users or developers. Ya!
enjoy,
Andrew
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list