[wip] "info auxv"
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 23:16:00 GMT 2003
This work-in-progress is more questions than answers.
- Common code in "procfs.c" (tested) and "inftarg.c"
It makes me wonder if the native inferior code should be re-arranged
(has this come up before?).
- The new files "auxv.[hc]" for parsing the file.
Perhaphs it belongs in "procfs.c" but that gets me back to the first
question - could the native inferior code be better structured?
Andrew
(gdb) info auxv
2008 ??? 0xffbeff88
2014 ??? 0xffbeff96
3 Program headers for program 0x10034
4 Size of program header entry 0x20
5 Number of program headers 0x5
9 Entry point of program 0x10510
7 Base address of interpreter 0xff3c0000
8 Flags 0x300
6 System page size 0x2000
2000 ??? 0x9f4
2001 ??? 0x9f4
2002 ??? 0x9f9
2003 ??? 0x9f9
2009 ??? 0x7
0 End of vector 0x0
0 End of vector 0x0
0 End of vector 0x0
0 End of vector 0x0
0 End of vector 0x0
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diffs
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20031110/bd9df92f/attachment.ksh>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list