[rfa] always use demangled name to set scope

[David Carlton]

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:56:12 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:

>> > That's namespace deduction.  Nested type deduction is a slightly
>> > different story - the principle is the same but we already have all
>> > the information we need.
>> 
>> Not if the type is nested inside a namespace.  If your code is full of

> Violent agreement again.  I'm using the words differently from you; I
> was strictly speaking about
> class C {
>   class D {
>     ..
>   };
> };

Ah, right.  I sometimes forget that not everybody in the world thinks
of namespaces as types.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu