[RFA] alpha_register_reggroup_p
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@redhat.com
Mon Jun 2 03:54:00 GMT 2003
> The main object here is to get the FPCR to be considered
> part of the FP state. It's not immediately clear what to
> do with the PALcode UNIQ value, but "system" seems a good
> choice.
> * alpha-tdep.c (alpha_register_reggroup_p): New.
> (alpha_gdbarch_init): Register it.
>
> --- alpha-tdep.c.11 2003-06-01 20:11:56.000000000 -0700
> +++ alpha-tdep.c 2003-06-01 20:15:28.000000000 -0700
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
>
> #include "defs.h"
> +#include "doublest.h"
> #include "frame.h"
> #include "frame-unwind.h"
> #include "frame-base.h"
> @@ -34,7 +35,7 @@
> #include "gdb_string.h"
> #include "linespec.h"
> #include "regcache.h"
> -#include "doublest.h"
> +#include "reggroups.h"
> #include "arch-utils.h"
> #include "osabi.h"
> #include "block.h"
> @@ -102,6 +103,39 @@ alpha_register_virtual_type (int regno)
> return builtin_type_int64;
> }
>
> +/* Is REGNUM a member of REGGROUP? */
> +
> +static int
> +alpha_register_reggroup_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum,
> + struct reggroup *group)
> +{
> + /* Filter out any registers eliminated, but whose regnum is
> + reserved for backward compatibility, e.g. the vfp. */
> + if (REGISTER_NAME (regnum) == NULL || *REGISTER_NAME (regnum) == '\0')
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Since we implement no pseudo registers, save/restore is equal to all. */
> + if (group == all_reggroup
> + || group == save_reggroup
> + || group == restore_reggroup)
> + return 1;
Should UNIQ be in save/restore (I don't know, I'm just asking)?
> + /* All other groups are non-overlapping. */
> +
> + /* Since this is really a PALcode memory slot... */
> + if (regnum == ALPHA_UNIQUE_REGNUM)
> + return group == system_reggroup;
> +
> + /* Force the FPCR to be considered part of the floating point state. */
> + if (regnum == ALPHA_FPCR_REGNUM)
> + return group == float_reggroup;
Good. Finally a useful "info float".
> + if (regnum >= ALPHA_FP0_REGNUM && regnum < ALPHA_FP0_REGNUM + 31)
> + return group == float_reggroup;
> + else
> + return group == general_reggroup;
> +}
yes, ok.
Andrew
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list