[rfa:doco] Doco problems with level two annotations

[Andrew Cagney]

> [Sorry for the long delay in replying to this message.]

And an even longer response on my part.

>> Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:34:33 -0400
>> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>> 
>> Anyway, the real reason is that I happen to know that the GNU Press 
>> person would like the GDB group to try to keep the basic user manual 
>> trim.
> 
> 
> If that's the real reason, let's at least document it, either in a
> comment in the .texi file or in the ChangeLog, lest some helpful soul
> will want to make it an appendix in a distant future.
> 
> We could arrange for this paper to become an appendix only in the
> on-line manual (using @itex), but if that is too much work (since I
> think the menus and possibly @node lines will need to be @iftex'ed as
> well as the text itself), I have no objections to doing it your way.

Here's the patch with the missing Makefile tweak, and a comment 
indicating why its separate.

thoughts?
Andrew

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diffs
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20030729/5b509cb2/attachment.ksh>