OC?

Andrew Cagney ac131313@redhat.com
Tue Jan 28 19:45:00 GMT 2003


> Hi Andrew!
> 
> 
>> Turns out this has been done.
>>
> 
>> > We have also problems with registers. You were saying something that we
>> > should move all the registers (we have 8k+ registers with generated
>> > names) into the temporary storage (I hope all these won't get cached in
>> > the host...).

8k * 8 bytes ~= 64k.

Either that all lives in the text segment, or it is only allocated when 
all the names are asked for.

>> Yes.  A gui for instance will likely want access to all names at once.
> 
> I tried to fix this issue, but there were not enough documentation nor such 
> targets for me to dig through. Is it possible that you (or somebody else) 
> change this please?

I'm not sure what the problem is.  Just wrap the current code in 
something that maintains a table of previously returned names.

Andrew





More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list