OC?
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@redhat.com
Tue Jan 28 19:45:00 GMT 2003
> Hi Andrew!
>
>
>> Turns out this has been done.
>>
>
>> > We have also problems with registers. You were saying something that we
>> > should move all the registers (we have 8k+ registers with generated
>> > names) into the temporary storage (I hope all these won't get cached in
>> > the host...).
8k * 8 bytes ~= 64k.
Either that all lives in the text segment, or it is only allocated when
all the names are asked for.
>> Yes. A gui for instance will likely want access to all names at once.
>
> I tried to fix this issue, but there were not enough documentation nor such
> targets for me to dig through. Is it possible that you (or somebody else)
> change this please?
I'm not sure what the problem is. Just wrap the current code in
something that maintains a table of previously returned names.
Andrew
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list