[patch] lucid demangling XFAIL->KFAIL
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu
Fri Jan 17 20:27:00 GMT 2003
The test gdb.c++/demangle.exp has what claims to be a bug in our Lucid
demangling, which is XFAILed. I don't know if it's a bug or not; I do
know that neither I nor anybody else cares. I've filed a PR for it,
suspended the PR (since we're not sure if it's a bug and the
demangling style should be obsoleted, anyways), and converted the
XFAIL to a KFAIL.
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu
2003-01-17 David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
* gdb.c++/demangle.exp (test_lucid_style_demangling): KFAIL test
corresponding to PR c++/945.
Update copyright.
Index: demangle.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/demangle.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 demangle.exp
--- demangle.exp 13 Jan 2002 23:54:10 -0000 1.2
+++ demangle.exp 17 Jan 2003 20:23:46 -0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright (C) 1992, 1997, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# Copyright (C) 1992, 1997, 1999, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -694,7 +694,10 @@ proc test_lucid_style_demangling {} {
# GDB 930701 gets into an infinite loop.
# GDB 930727 says "Can't demangle".
# What is the correct demangling? FIXME.
- setup_xfail "*-*-*"
+
+ # NOTE: carlton/2003-01-17: No, don't FIXME, just obsolete lucid.
+ # I'm KFAILing this rather than deleting it for form's sake.
+ setup_kfail "gdb/945" "*-*-*"
test_demangling_exact "lucid: __vtbl__3foo__vt_cc_main_" ""
test_demangling_exact "lucid: abs__F7complex" "abs(complex)"
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list