[RFC/RFA] New 'to' command

[Elena Zannoni]

Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:09:51PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > > Fernando Nasser writes:
 > >  > Sorry to get back to the name thing. But I believe the discussion concentrated 
 > >  > more on the semantics of the two commands and how until would be implemented -- 
 > >  > nobody was specifically fond of the names that came up in any case.
 > >  > 
 > >  > What about "advance-to"?  You can add "to" as an alias, I don't mind (although I 
 > >  > don't thing we need/should as typing "adv" will suffice)..
 > >  > 
 > >  > I believe it captures the idea of what the user is trying to do in this case.
 > > 
 > > I like it. 
 > > going once, going twice, sold ?
 > 
 > Until stays in this stack frame, advance-to goes to anything as long as
 > the frame doesn't exit?  Sold to me.  Thanks for the name, Fernando!
 > 

yes, until is untouched. Same as it was. Advance is for the new command.

Ok. Phew!

Elena


 > 
 > -- 
 > Daniel Jacobowitz
 > MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer