[patch] README: remove references to deleted remote-*.c

[Andrew Cagney]

> mec> By the way, what happens to bugs reported to the mailing lists?
> mec> Is anyone entering them into Gnats?
> 
> andrew> They dried up!  The power of documentation!

Ok, I take that back.  There was a marked shift but not that dramatic. 
Looks like I've been un-subscribed.

> I still see legitimate bug reports in bug-gdb@gnu.org.
> 
>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gdb/2003-01/index.html
>     http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gdb/2003-01/msg00004.html
>     http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gdb/2003-01/msg00009.html
>     http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gdb/2003-01/msg00010.html
>     http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gdb/2003-01/msg00008.html
> 
> These bug reports aren't going in to Gnats.  So they get whatever
> service they get on the spot, and then we forget about them.
> 
> I still see plenty of spam in bug-gdb@gnu.org as well.
> 
> I wrote to bug-gdb-owner on 2002-12-29 offering to administer the list.
> It's been more than a week and I've gotten nothing in return: no
> acknowledgement, no nothing.
> 
> I would like gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com to subscribe to
> bug-gdb@gnu.org, so that bug reports from bug-gdb become part of
> our official bug database.

I've found people are largly co-operative if you ask them to submit the 
bug via the web interface.

If it really is still receiving much spam then that subscribe wouldn't 
help (and could possibly confuse things).  sware would bounce a bug 
submittion that @gnu.org had accepted, or sware would just end up full 
of spam reports.

Andrew