[rfa] more lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms futzing

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:57:37PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:08:19 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
> 
> > A few comments
> 
> Ack! I was considering this patch to be withdrawn, and I hadn't
> noticed that it got added to GNATS.  Right now, all I'm proposing is
> the search_symbols part of this patch (with a comment added), as in PR
> symtab/1049.  (Incidentally, I'm curious if Daniel considers the patch
> in symtab/1070 to still be active: if so, please review the e-mail
> discussion that Daniel and I had about this.  I actually have more to
> say about that if you're considering approving that patch.)

Yes, I never withdrew it; that's why I forwarded it to GNATS.

> 1) A patch to correct a slight bug that remains in
>    lookup_partial_symbol.  Basically, partial symbols are sorted via
>    strcmp but we want to use strcmp_iw as our matching criterion;
>    strcmp and strcmp_iw aren't _quite_ suitable to be used together in
>    this way.

Should they be sorted via strcmp_iw instead?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer