[rfa] add DMGL_PARAMS (was: new demangler)
Tue Dec 16 19:23:00 GMT 2003
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 08:54:57AM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:30:22 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com> said:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:38:28PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> >> Okay; I'll just stick in the DMGL_PARAMS for now, then - my tests
> >> start passing again with that change. (Or I could rewrite the code
> >> that parses the output to not look for parentheses, I suppose.)
> > Do the former for now.
> The latter actually should be easy enough given the parsing
> functionality that's already in cp-support.c, but I have no objection
> to the former, which I present here. Is it okay for mainline? Tested
> on i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.2, DWARF 2; no regressions. (No tests,
> but it's necessary for my current patch awaiting approval to work
> David Carlton
> 2003-12-16 David Carlton <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> * cp-support.c (class_name_from_physname): Add DMGL_PARAMS.
> (method_name_from_physname): Ditto.
Yes, this is fine. Thanks!
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Gdb-patches