[PATCH] Outwit compiler dead code elimination in break.exp test
Tue Dec 9 01:02:00 GMT 2003
Fred Fish wrote:
>>I know that GCC will now, when -O is specified, inline (and thence
>>eliminate) pure functions. However, I don't think that should occure
>>when -O isn't specified.
> It doesn't. The gdb specifically uses optimization for the test that
> is currently failing:
> FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: run until breakpoint set at small function, optimized file
Ah. And I was gonna say "GCC shouldn't do that without optimization
turned on". Never mind, I guess...
More information about the Gdb-patches