[rfa/c++] cp_lookup_rtti_type, take 2
Fri Dec 5 17:16:00 GMT 2003
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:57:56AM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:29:59 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:40:39PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote:
> >> . The calls to lookup_rtti_type need a proper "block" parameter.
> >> The old code needed this too; I haven't regressed anything.
> >> I put FIXME notes in for this.
> > I'm not as sure as you are about this - certainly we do _not_ want a
> > block that came down the call chain; think about what dynamic type
> > is.
> Good point. Oops.
> > Ignoring anonymous namespaces for now.)
> > Now that we've had another major release of GDB I am extremely
> > tempted to rip out aCC C++ support.
> You'll get no complaints from me.
> >> . Nested types give a warning and don't work.
> >> It would be nice to make them work.
> > It's a pain. I spent quite some time trying to sort out the issues.
> > I'll give it a shot again after more of David's patches have been
> > merged.
> I think they should work okay after my patch that is waiting for
> approval gets applied?
Perhaps. I was working with stabs at the time.
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Gdb-patches