[commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
Mon Dec 1 21:25:00 GMT 2003
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:07:32PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> > Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 10:47:01 -0500
>> > From: Andrew Cagney <email@example.com>
>> > >
>> > > But that's precisely why we have the patch review and approval
>> > > procedure, right? Maintainers who approve patches are supposed to
>> > > prevent code that uses deprecated machinery from being added.
>> > Very true. Explicit deprecation is a tool for making that part of the
>> > maintainer and contributor task far easier. Instead of wasting time
>> > trying to track and find all the things being eliminated, the
>> > contributor and reviewer can simply keep an eye out for deprecated in
>> > their patches
>> I'm not convinced that detecting STREQ is harder than detecting
> Neither am I... Andrew, how would you feel about a central (in the
> source tree) list of deprecated objects instead?
I see you didn't reply to the attached e-mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Andrew Cagney <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:08:54 -0500
More information about the Gdb-patches