[rfa] save space by using enum bitfields

[David Carlton]

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:49:56 -0700, Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> said:

> I gotta say, this looks like uglification to me.  Is it worth it?

I won't venture an opinion on whether or not it's worth it, but I
don't like all those : 8's that it inserts.  Why not stick that into
the definition of ENUM_BITFIELD?  Though that would have the cost that
you'd need to have the member's name be an argument to ENUM_BITFIELD,
which wouldn't be an improvement.  Hmm.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com