RFA: Actual support for tracing forks on GNU/Linux

[Mark Kettenis]

   Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:48:49 -0400
   From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>

   Ping.

Sorry Daniel for not responding earlier.  I've had almost no time to
spend on hacking since the second half of june and I've just returned
from a vacation in Finland.  Anyway, I do have a few comments:

* I'm not very enthousiastic about the staggering of
  CHILD_POST_STARTUP_INFERIOR and LINUX_CHILD_POST_STARTUP_INFERIOR,
  especially since it infects i386-nat.c.  However, I'm pretty sure
  there isn't a better alternative that doesn't involve redisigning
  the target vector :-(.  I'd appreciate though if you could stick in
  a comment somewhere that says this is really ugly.

* The changes to lin-lwp.c seem pretty much OK to me.

So I think this can go in.

Mark