[patch/5.3] No __FUNCTION__

[Andrew Cagney]

> On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 11:41:00AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> I've committed the attached (with a hesatant ok from MarkK) (HEAD and 
>> branch).
>> 
>> What GDB needs is something that works regardless of the compiler.
>> 
>> Andrew
> 
> 
> Where is this usage of __FUNCTION__ not portable?  Concatenating it
> with things, now there's a problem; but I don't remember any compiler
> that couldn't handle function(__FUNCTION__).

The macro __FUNCTION__ isn't part of ISO C 90.

Andrew