[RFC] GDB interpreters

[Keith Seitz]

On Tue, 21 May 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> However, it sounds, at least for the commands you included in this
> patch, like they should be documented in gdb.texinfo, not in the MI part,
> since they are not parts of the MI.  Or did I miss something?

Doh! You're right: my brain wasn't fully functional. Let me revise: I will
document whatever I remember to document. Someone should scream at me if I
miss anything else! :-)

> Can we have completion on known interpreter names in these commands?  The
> default completer function completes on symbols from the inferior, which
> is really not a good idea in this case ;-)

I can certainly look into that...

Keith