GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Tue Mar 19 10:31:00 GMT 2002
On Mar 19, 2002, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> wrote:
> OK, I think this is fine now, but you forgot one PTR in defs.h, see
> below.
It was not forgotten, but rather intentionally left in. Since some
compilers are picky about differences between PTR and void*, and there
still are a number of function definitions and declarations that used
PTR, I thought I wouldn't take such a bold step at this time.
> Check it in, thanks.
Mainline and 5.2 branch?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list