GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Tue Mar 19 10:31:00 GMT 2002


On Mar 19, 2002, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> wrote:

> OK, I think this is fine now, but you forgot one PTR in defs.h, see
> below.

It was not forgotten, but rather intentionally left in.  Since some
compilers are picky about differences between PTR and void*, and there
still are a number of function definitions and declarations that used
PTR, I thought I wouldn't take such a bold step at this time.

> Check it in, thanks.

Mainline and 5.2 branch?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list