RFA: next gettextization step

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:

Andrew> If I understand things correctly, the main.c change can go in
Andrew> without the po/ change?  The configure.in patch can also be
Andrew> split in two leaving out the po/ part?

There's no point in splitting the configure.in patch.  The PACKAGE
subst is only used by po/Make-in.

Andrew> If this is correct then those parts are free to go in.

Thanks, I'm checking in the main.c change.

Andrew> I'd like to see the po/ directory issues resolved (I've sent
Andrew> an e-mail to binutils) before that is also created.

Ok.  Feel free to CC me on that discussion if you like.

Tom