[RFA/c++testsuite] New test for constructor breakpoints

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 06:03:59PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Aieee, I am having an instant allergic reaction to -notransfer.  Nothing
> else in the test suite uses it except for some internal multi-line stuff
> in gdb_test which I do not trust at all.  So we get to be the first
> soldier on the beach.  I don't want to have result variations depending
> on what version of "expect" somebody has.
> 
> There's got to be a better way of tracking which breakpoints have
> been successfully set.  Maybe set_bp_overloaded should record that
> information?

It has been in expect since at least 1995.  I'd much prefer not to have
an allergic reaction to it; in fact I'd much prefer to use it more
universally, to reduce similar cascades.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer