(toplevel) Fix dramatic breakage for ordinary crosses (related to program_transform_name)
Dan Kegel
dank@kegel.com
Sat Dec 28 10:46:00 GMT 2002
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>
>>It's a question of whether you can do the locking without making people
>>throw up, I think.
>
>
> I'm confident I can, but... On second thought, it occurs to me that
> all locking would accomplish is let one make in a make -j pool run one
> configure script while other makes block on the lock. Not good...
I dunno, sounds fine to me if it lets the subsequent real build
go in parallel.
--
Dan Kegel
Linux User #78045
http://www.kegel.com
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list