(toplevel) Fix dramatic breakage for ordinary crosses (related to program_transform_name)

Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com
Sat Dec 28 10:46:00 GMT 2002


Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>It's a question of whether you can do the locking without making people
>>throw up, I think.
> 
> 
> I'm confident I can, but...  On second thought, it occurs to me that
> all locking would accomplish is let one make in a make -j pool run one
> configure script while other makes block on the lock.  Not good...

I dunno, sounds fine to me if it lets the subsequent real build
go in parallel.

-- 
Dan Kegel
Linux User #78045
http://www.kegel.com



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list