[rfa] delete 'force_return' from lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

More news ...

> I am not sure if David committed it yet, but the patch it at the
> bottom of:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-12/msg00560.html
> Maybe you already tested it!

After grubbing around in three unrelated regressions, I can say that
this patch is cool and not causing any visible regressions.  There are
no problems in gdb from 2002-12-18 to 2002-12-21.  gcc broke anonymous
unions though.

Next up is JimB's patch submission for gdb.c++/local.exp.

Michael C