[RFA] New bitflags type and eflags on i386/x86-64

[Andrew Cagney]

Attatched is an old and related patch I've dug out of an old branch of 
GDB that Red Hat was providing for a customer.

I don't actually care what the type of eflags ends up being (the 
attached looks like):

(top-gdb) info registers
....
eflags         {eflags = 0x216, bits = {ID = 0x0, VIP = 0x0, VIF = 0x0,
     AC = 0x0, VM = 0x0, RF = 0x0, NT = 0x0, IOPL = 0x0, OF = 0x0, DF = 
0x0,
     IF = 0x1, TF = 0x0, SF = 0x0, ZF = 0x0, AF = 0x1, PF = 0x1,
     CF = 0x0}}  {eflags = 534, bits = {ID = 0, VIP = 0, VIF = 0, AC = 0,
     VM = 0, RF = 0, NT = 0, IOPL = 0, OF = 0, DF = 0, IF = 1, TF = 0, 
SF = 0,
     ZF = 0, AF = 1, PF = 1, CF = 0}}

However, given that there are two implementations, I get the feeling 
that [possibly fee paying] users want something.

Andrew

(that reminds me, ``AC'' et.al. should be in lower case).
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diffs
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20020827/9aa01c33/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
Subject: [RFA] New bitflags type and eflags on i386/x86-64
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:34:56 +0200
Size: 12746
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20020827/9aa01c33/attachment.eml>