[RFC] FORTRAN95 Expression parser
Michael Snyder
msnyder@redhat.com
Mon Apr 29 18:49:00 GMT 2002
Petr Sorfa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've created a FORTRAN95 expression parser for GDB. It is based off the
> current FORTRAN expression parser, but has changed significantly in
> source and functionality. I've developed it as a new separate parser
> with the file prefix of f95-x as opposed to the existing f-x files.
>
> The question is whether I should submit the patch as the f95-x files
> (which will leave the current FORTRAN parser untouched) or replace the
> existing FORTRAN parser?
>
> Note that the F95 parser fully supports F77/F90/F95, but differs a bit
> from the existing fortran gdb parser (which relies a bit heavily on C
> notation.)
How much does it differ? Functionally? In user-visible ways?
How about test suites?
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list