gdb-patches Digest 3 Apr 2002 00:52:01 -0000 Issue 1049

[David Anderson]

>I didn't know that the existing libdwarf had been LGPL'd; the copy on
>SGI's site certainly hasn't been, but that's a bit old.  However, it's
>exceedingly unlikely we could get the copyright assigned to the FSF.

Hm. Which site "hasn't been"?

Yes, SGI's libdwarf is LGPL, but 
I agree it is unlikely FSF could get the copyright.


davea@sgi.com