[RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures

Andrew Cagney ac131313@cygnus.com
Wed Oct 10 01:25:00 GMT 2001


> Thanks!
> 
> 
> OK -- so where do we stand?  Are you OK with this patch going in?
> To be refined later as necessary?

I'm ok with the current set of changes (need to contact David Taylor 
though).  The debate is about the semantics of a type cast and that 
depends on this change being present.

While this is happening, can I suggest cleaning things up a little - 
stray +/- blank lines, coding standard and some missing ChangeLog 
entries (TYPE_AS_TYPE?).

Andrew




More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list