[RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@cygnus.com
Wed Oct 10 01:25:00 GMT 2001
> Thanks!
>
>
> OK -- so where do we stand? Are you OK with this patch going in?
> To be refined later as necessary?
I'm ok with the current set of changes (need to contact David Taylor
though). The debate is about the semantics of a type cast and that
depends on this change being present.
While this is happening, can I suggest cleaning things up a little -
stray +/- blank lines, coding standard and some missing ChangeLog
entries (TYPE_AS_TYPE?).
Andrew
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list