RFA: correctly compute addresses of embedded objects
Jim Blandy
jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com
Sun May 20 13:06:00 GMT 2001
Dan's correct --- this patch is wrong. I withdraw it.
Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> writes:
> Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com> writes:
> > 2001-05-17 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
> >
> > * valops.c (value_addr): Don't include VALUE_EMBEDDED_OFFSET in
> > the pointer value we return. It should point at the embedded
> > object ARG1 represents, not at the enclosing object ARG1 might
> > also be holding.
>
> Errr, value_addr gives back something for which arg1 is the
> contents.
>
> We then set the VALUE_POINTED_TO_OFFSET to the VALUE_EMBEDDED_OFFSET of
> arg1, to keep track of the relative location of the subobject in the
> full object.
> In other words, the embedded object is at the address of the enclosing
> object + the embedded offset .
> So the actual pointer *should* include the embedded offset, because
> this is where the embedded object really is.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list