[RFA]: Remote protocol symbol lookup service.
Jonathan Larmour
jlarmour@redhat.com
Thu May 3 11:15:00 GMT 2001
Michael Snyder wrote:
>
> Hmmm... I suppose so, under the right set of assumptions.
> Such as that the target is not really stopped, and we do not
> need to restart it (as with the 'O' packet).
I don't see any special treatment with the 'O' packet. If the target is
stopped, how could it have made a request?
If you do take this route, don't forget remote_async_wait().
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list