[RFA] Unified watchpoints for x86 platforms
Sun Mar 18 00:57:00 GMT 2001
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Oh, by the way, I don't think it's necessary to list changes for newly
> added files to the ChangeLog. Just something like:
> * i386-nat.c: New file.
> should be enough.
I know. But does it hurt to have the new functions listed as well?
I was always annoyed by the fact that the first functions on each file
need to be deduced by elimination, instead of just reading the logs.
For example, imagine that you want to know when was a certain function
More information about the Gdb-patches