[RFA] testsuite/gdb.c++/ref-types.exp: use runto
Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Fri Mar 16 13:15:00 GMT 2001
Mmmm, a philosophical dispute.
Daniel Berlin writes:
> They need to be xfail'd for old-abi, but not for new-abi.
I believe that when gdb has a bug which is under its control, that the
test suite should issue a FAIL, not an XFAIL.
Here is a gdb log entry for gcc 2.95.2, gdb CVS, Red Hat Linux 7 native,
(gdb) print pAe->f()
$1 = 134547192
(gdb) XFAIL: gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp: print pAe->f()
If gdb said "I'm sorry, but pAe->f() is too complex for me", I would
accept that as an XFAIL. But when gdb prints wrong answers, that should
be a FAIL.
I'm interested in other maintainer's opinions on this because I'm
planning to submit patches to change such XFAIL's to FAIL's, so that
the test suite can actually report what is broken in C++ support.
More information about the Gdb-patches