[RFA] Revised C++ ABI abstraction patches
Thu Mar 15 18:58:00 GMT 2001
Andrew Cagney <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> When Dan originally submitted his original patch it was large.
> Fortunatly it was only (mostly) the mechanical change of separating out
> the C++ stuff (it was also approved so I don't know why it wasn't
It wasn't committed because it needed a little work.
By the time i finished the work, it had grown. Feature creep.
> Now, however, the patch has managed to accumulate much much
> more (sigh). This really should be broken down into the mechanical
> change of creating a new file and the modifications that fix real
Should I break it into the addition of the new files, and the others
Unfortunately, they'll be dependent on each other, but i can't think
of how to break it up so it isn't.
More information about the Gdb-patches