[RFA] Revised C++ ABI abstraction patches
Thu Mar 15 13:46:00 GMT 2001
Jim Blandy wrote:
> Michael Elizabeth Chastain <email@example.com> writes:
> > Lightly proofread, no obvious errors found.
> Great. That means all the bugs still there are non-obvious, and will
> take a long time to find. Just make my day, will you. (Thanks.)
> > I would prefer constructor_prefix_p et al to be real functions rather
> > than macros. When I single-step code in gdb, it's a lot easier to follow
> > real functions than macros.
> I agree completely. But it is not the standard practice (see target.h
> and elsewhere) and others don't seem to mind. So I reined in my prima
> donna urges and left them as macros.
Standard pratice is to use functions. Per the thread on the
xfer_memory() change - target.h will be fixed :-)
More information about the Gdb-patches