[rfc] Replace ARCH_NUM_REGS with NUM_REGS

Andrew Cagney ac131313@cygnus.com
Tue Mar 13 15:34:00 GMT 2001

FYI, I've checked this in.


Index: ChangeLog
2001-03-08  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>

        * inferior.h (ARCH_NUM_REGS): Delete definition.
        * stack.c (frame_info): Use NUM_REGS, not ARCH_NUM_REGS.
        * regcache.c (registers_changed): Ditto.
        (registers_fetched): Ditto.
        * infptrace.c (fetch_inferior_registers): Ditto.
        (store_inferior_registers): Ditto.
        * infcmd.c (do_registers_info): Ditto.
        (registers_info): Ditto.
        * i386-linux-nat.c (old_fetch_inferior_registers): Ditto.
        (old_store_inferior_registers): Ditto.
        * gdbserver/low-linux.c (register_addr): Ditto.
        * gdbserver/low-hppabsd.c (register_addr): Ditto.
        * core-aout.c: Don't include "inferior.h".
        (fetch_core_registers): Use NUM_REGS not ARCH_NUM_REGS.
        (register_addr): Ditto.

Index: mi/ChangeLog
2001-03-08  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>

        * mi-main.c (mi_cmd_data_list_register_names): Use NUM_REGS, not
        (mi_cmd_data_list_changed_registers): Ditto.
        (mi_cmd_data_list_register_values): Ditto.
        (mi_cmd_data_write_register_values): Ditto.

Index: tui/ChangeLog
2001-03-08  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>

        * tuiRegs.c: Use NUM_REGS, not ARCH_NUM_REGS.

More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list