[RFA] Link remote target with svr4 solibs.
Tue Mar 13 10:31:00 GMT 2001
Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Michael Snyder wrote:
> > > Doesn't this argue that this should reside somewhere above
> > > remote_open()?
> > I'm open to suggestions. The other place from which it is called
> > is fork_inferior. Remote targets do not fork. Open is the best
> > place I could think of.
> Two thoughts.
> remote_open_1()/remote_async_open_1() are slightly less painful than
> Given the current arrangement, there isn't much choice.
> Assuming ok with J.T. as well, can you add it to those functions along
> with a FIXME. Plenty of other examples can already be found.
OK with you, JT?
More information about the Gdb-patches