[RFA] Link remote target with svr4 solibs.

Andrew Cagney ac131313@cygnus.com
Tue Mar 13 08:52:00 GMT 2001

Michael Snyder wrote:

> > Doesn't this argue that this should reside somewhere above
> > remote_open()?
> I'm open to suggestions.  The other place from which it is called
> is fork_inferior.  Remote targets do not fork.  Open is the best
> place I could think of.

Two thoughts.

remote_open_1()/remote_async_open_1() are slightly less painful than

Given the current arrangement, there isn't much choice.

Assuming ok with J.T. as well, can you add it to those functions along
with a FIXME.  Plenty of other examples can already be found.


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list