[RFA] Link remote target with svr4 solibs.
Tue Mar 13 08:52:00 GMT 2001
Michael Snyder wrote:
> > Doesn't this argue that this should reside somewhere above
> > remote_open()?
> I'm open to suggestions. The other place from which it is called
> is fork_inferior. Remote targets do not fork. Open is the best
> place I could think of.
remote_open_1()/remote_async_open_1() are slightly less painful than
Given the current arrangement, there isn't much choice.
Assuming ok with J.T. as well, can you add it to those functions along
with a FIXME. Plenty of other examples can already be found.
More information about the Gdb-patches