Mon Mar 5 15:43:00 GMT 2001
> I think Michael's changes are incredibly useful to have, not only for
> my script, but also for those of us who use the ChangeLog files for
> research. And it may prove to be especially useful to those who do
> not have access to the Red Hat's internal CVS respository.
I don't dispute the usefulness of this information. However, I don't
think that rewriting old ChangeLogs is the correct way to do it. The
basic idea behind a ChangeLog is that it is append only - warts,
spelling mistakes, and all.
I find it is the unchanging nature of a ChangeLog that makes it useful
when doing research.
More information about the Gdb-patches