Patch review process

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:02:00PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:14:38PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> 
>>>The other one is a way of better tracking patches.  At present, in the
>>>end, it is still me using my mailbox for manual processing.
>> 
>> 
>> Didn't we discuss tracking patches in the PR database at one point?
>
>
>It tripped up when testing revealed that you couldn't reliably extract a 
>patch.  I think it is also a hack, it lacks the tight integration that 
>some other systems have.

We're using a new version of GNATS on sourceware these days.  I don't
know if it is any better or not for extracting patches, though.

cgf