RFA: Properly detect that GDB was compiled without MI support
Jim Blandy
jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com
Wed Jun 6 15:13:00 GMT 2001
Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com> writes:
> Jim, I must be seeing double, but I think this output is already
> handled in the -re directly below the one you changed.
> (Ok I am jet-lagged, so excuse me if I am wrong).
>
> -re ".*unrecognized option.*for a complete list of options." {
> untested "Skip mi tests (not compiled with mi support)."
> remote_close host;
> return -1;
> }
> -re ".*Interpreter `mi' unrecognized." {
> untested "Skip mi tests (not compiled with mi support)."
> remote_close host;
> return -1;
> }
No, you're absolutely right. I generated that patch against an
internal branch cut on January 23; Mark Kettenis fixed the bug in the
public sources on January 21, and I guess it hadn't gotten merged yet.
Shame on me for not testing against the public sources.
I withdraw the patch.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list