[rfc/rfa(DavidT?)] Move DOUBLEST to doublest.{h,c}

Mark Kettenis kettenis@wins.uva.nl
Mon Jul 30 14:41:00 GMT 2001


   Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:34:36 -0400
   From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>

   >> > * config/m88k/tm-m88k.h: Include "doublest.h".
   >> > * config/m68k/tm-m68k.h, config/i960/tm-i960.h: Ditto.
   >> > * config/i386/xm-nbsd.h, config/i386/xm-linux.h: Ditto.
   >> > * config/i386/xm-i386gnu.h, config/i386/xm-go32.h: Ditto.
   >> > * config/i386/xm-fbsd.h, config/i386/tm-symmetry.h: Ditto.
   > 
   > 
   > Why are you including "doublest.h" from various tm.h and xm.h files?
   > Most of them don't use DOUBLEST at all, so this seems wrong to me.

   Headers such as tm-m88k.h contain macros that refer to functions such as 
   store_floating().  I moved those functions to doublest.h.

I see, but how about the i386/xm-*.h files?  I'm asking since I'm
thinking about replacing most of them with a single xm-i386.h with the
following contents:

   /* FIXME: kettenis/2001-07-29: Get rid of HOST_BYTE_ORDER when Andrew
      has erradicated it from the sources.  */
   #define HOST_BYTE_ORDER LITTLE_ENDIAN

   #define HOST_FLOAT_FORMAT &floatformat_ieee_single_little
   #define HOST_DOUBLE_FORMAT &floatformat_ieee_double_little
   #define HOST_LONG_DOUBLE_FORMAT &floatformat_i387_ext

Mark



   Yes, ulgh :-)

	   Andrew




More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list