[rfa/doc] Mention -i=mi0; Was: [patch] Add -i=mi0 as an interpreter
Eli Zaretskii
eliz@is.elta.co.il
Wed Jul 4 23:52:00 GMT 2001
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> The attatched patch mentions -i=mi, -i=mi0 and even -i=mi1. Ok?
It's okay, but:
> ! @samp{--interpreter=mi} (or @samp{--interpreter=mi1}) causes
> ! @value{GDBN} to use the @dfn{gdbmi interface} (@pxref{GDB/MI, , The
> ! @sc{gdb/mi} Interface}). The older @dfn{gdbmi interface} included in
> ! @value{GDBN} version 5.0 can be selected with @samp{--interpreter=mi0}.
Please don't use @dfn{gdbmi interface} more than once in the same
section. @dfn is for introducing new terms; once you've introduced
it, it shouldn't be needed to do that again in the next sentence.
Also, I believe we were saying gdb/mi all over the place, not gdbmi.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list