procfs.c thinks pid's can't be bigger than 99999

Michael Snyder msnyder@cygnus.com
Mon Jul 2 11:56:00 GMT 2001


John Hughes wrote:
> 
> but on some systems, for example UnixWare NSC they
> can be quite a lot bigger.
> 
> --- procfs.c.orig       Tue May 15 02:03:36 2001
> +++ procfs.c    Mon Jul  2 14:40:05 2001
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@
>  #  define AS_PROC_NAME_FMT     "/proc/%d/as"
>  #  define MAP_PROC_NAME_FMT    "/proc/%d/map"
>  #  define STATUS_PROC_NAME_FMT "/proc/%d/status"
> -#  define MAX_PROC_NAME_SIZE sizeof("/proc/99999/lwp/8096/lstatus")
> +#  define MAX_PROC_NAME_SIZE sizeof("/proc/1048576/lwp/8096/lstatus")
>  # endif
>  /* the name of the proc status struct depends on the implementation */
>  typedef pstatus_t   gdb_prstatus_t;

Well, actually, aren't we going to run into trouble if 
pids are bigger than 16 bits?  Or did Kevin Buettner's 
recent changes take care of that?

Other than that, I have no problem with this change.



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list