[PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch

Michael Snyder msnyder@cygnus.com
Wed Feb 21 15:19:00 GMT 2001


Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> 
> > I did this at first, but it seemed those only happened for certain
> > headers (something to do with $(SRCDIR)), so I undid it before
> > submitting the patch.
> > I'll redo it.
> 
> Yep.  What is happening is that no one can be bothered converting the
> entire file to that convention - automake will make the problem go away
> right :-).  Instead things just get incrementally tweaked when a new
> file is added, broken include dependency gets noticed (or someone gets
> board).

Actually, I thought that the practice was only done selectively.
I don't see its usefulness, except for headers that might have
different names for different configurations.



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list